Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Editorial: Greta Thunberg sees failure at climate change summit. She’s wrong

Editorial: Greta Thunberg sees failure at climate change summit. She’s wrong

  • 0
Greta Thunberg offered a cameo in which show?

Greta Thunberg, the Swedish teen famous for scolding polluters, criticized the “very vague” agreement struck as the COP26 summit wrapped up in Glasgow this month, saying it succeeded only in “watering down the blah, blah, blah.”

Thousands of young climate activists, Greta Thunberg among them, marched through Glasgow on Friday demanding action on the climate that will protect their future.(Dylan Martinez/Reuters)

Only a few days into the United Nations’ two-week climate conference, activist Greta Thunberg pronounced it a failure. The Swedish teen famous for scolding polluters later went on to slam the “very vague” agreement struck as the COP26 summit wrapped up in Glasgow this month, saying it succeeded only in “watering down the blah, blah, blah.”

She wasn’t alone in her disappointment. Even Alok Sharma, the British politician presiding over the conference, fought back tears as he declared himself “deeply sorry” about last-minute wording in the final agreement to “phase down” rather than “phase out” the use of coal for heat and power.

Time for a reality check. It should come as no surprise that COP26 ended without a revolution. There was no way to put an immediate end to the planet’s current reliance on fossil fuels, as Thunberg evidently expected. Success, in this case, depends on your expectations, and ours were mostly exceeded.

First, the conference ended with an agreement. That was no foregone conclusion going in, especially when China’s Xi Jinping and Russia’s Vladimir Putin decided not to show, and President Joe Biden had fences to mend after four years of climate hostility from former President Donald Trump.

While the final agreement is carefully hedged, it calls for more urgent emission cuts and promises assistance for developing countries adapting to climate impacts. Sharma’s tears notwithstanding, this was the first international climate deal to explicitly call for reducing the use of coal, which is the worst fossil fuel for greenhouse-gas emissions.

The landmark 2015 Paris Agreement didn’t even mention the role of fossil fuels in climate change. Today, we have a deal corresponding to the facts that scientists have known for many years: When carbon dioxide, methane and similar gases blanket the planet, they trap heat like a greenhouse. The result is global warming, which in turn causes severe weather and dangerously high sea levels.

The largest source of emissions comes from burning coal, gas and oil for electricity, heat and transportation. Agriculture and forestry contribute emissions on a vast scale as well. That’s the problem the world needs to solve — and calling out coal was a significant step forward.

Here’s another: Finally, the world’s governments agreed on rules for a global carbon-emissions market that will enable countries to trade carbon credits with each other. The idea is for polluters to buy credits from countries that can offset emissions with green projects, such as planting trees or building wind farms. This provides a financial incentive to reduce emissions on one side of the trade and to go green on the other.

It took six years to work out the details after the Paris Agreement established an initial framework for this potentially game-changing marketplace. Chicagoans with roots in commodity trading can rightly wonder what took so long.

Part of the complication resulted from experiments in the past, when carbon credits were traded without internationally recognized rules. COP26 negotiators agreed on a formula for valuing and tracking the old credits and addressed a loophole that could have allowed some countries to double-count their credits.

Getting the rules straight is essential, in part to keep rich nations from snapping up discounted credits so they can keep emitting as usual. Though operational details still need to be worked out, we have high hopes that a functioning market will encourage new investment and reduce emissions overall.

Finally, the COP26 agreement directs the world’s governments to arrive at COP27 in Egypt next year with updated plans for cutting emissions by 2030 and additional details on how to assist developing countries adapting to climate change. By putting participating nations on the hook to update their goals and report on their actions more regularly than in the past, the agreement shows a greater sense of urgency that even Thunberg should appreciate.

In the meantime, what can individuals do to make a difference? Quite a lot, actually.

For starters, there’s conservation. Turn down the heat, drive less, insulate, recycle and reduce waste. Consider electric vehicles, solar panels and switching to low-emission power suppliers. Plant trees and back organizations committed to preserving forests. Support companies that factor climate impact into their business decisions and publicly report their carbon footprint through CDP and other nonprofits.

Speak up about your concerns but do yourself and those around you a favor by staying out of the “green shame” game — as in “flight-shaming” those who travel by air, “meat-shaming” those who don’t eat vegan and “fashion-shaming” those wearing cheap, high-volume clothes.

Shame has a place in public discourse, but a young generation on the warpath over climate change already has gone overboard to the point of turning off potential allies. More will get done if we can accept that green comes in many different shades and, over time, we can all get greener together.

Other views is a sampling of other editorial board opinions on national issues.

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

As the United States tries to wean itself from fossil fuels and rebuild its infrastructure to make electric car usage more feasible, policymakers need to ask whether the nation is prepared for a risky trade-off: tying Americans to dependence on yet another foreign source of energy. The electricity powering these vehicles is generated entirely at home, but electric cars are useless without ...

Just when you think politics can’t get any weirder comes the news that Roger Stone wants to run for Florida governor. Yes, that Roger Stone, the sharp-elbowed political operative (from Richard Nixon to Donald Trump) and self-described dirty trickster. Ordinarily, this would be a disastrous idea. But these aren’t ordinary times. If Stone messes up Gov. Ron DeSantis’ reelection plans, we say: Go ...

Medicare Advantage plans are popular, convenient and fast-growing — and a rising drain on taxpayers, new research has found. A former federal health official said his analysis showed that Medicare overpaid these private plans by more than $106 billion in recent years, costs that are only expected to soar. Federal regulators and Congress need to get a grip on this spending, where every dollar ...

The best local coverage, unlimited

Sign up for a digital subscription to The Press of Atlantic City now and take advantage of a great offer.


Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


Breaking News