Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
James McGovern / Nuclear-waste site stalled, but U.S. still collects fee

James McGovern / Nuclear-waste site stalled, but U.S. still collects fee

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}

If someone had suggested 30 years ago that electricity users would be contributing billions of dollars to a government trust fund - and getting nothing in return - the idea would have been dismissed as fantasy.

But this is really happening, and there's a possibility it will continue indefinitely unless an effort is made to put a stop to it.

Since passage of the landmark Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, users of nuclear-generated electricity have paid a fee of one-tenth of a cent per kilowatt-hour toward construction of a deep-geologic repository to store high-level radioactive waste from electricity production and the manufacture of nuclear weapons. Congress designated Yucca Mountain, a remote and bone-dry area in the Nevada desert, as the site for the waste repository.

But four years ago President Barack Obama terminated the Yucca Mountain project after more than $10 billion and three decades of work had been spent on it. Although the high-level waste program has come to a standstill, with 69,720 metric tons of highly radioactive used fuel still stored at nuclear plants around the country, ratepayers continue to contribute to the waste fund.

Here in New Jersey, we have paid more than $665 million into the waste fund - and the money keeps flowing. Nationally, the payments exceed $35.7 billion - and they are growing at a rate of $300 million each year.

What's more, the Department of Energy was legally obligated to take possession of the used-fuel rods no later than 1998, but the used fuel remains where it always has been, in engineered water pools and concrete-and-steel casks at nuclear plants. Reactors like Salem 1 and 2, Hope Creek and Oyster Creek in New Jersey were not designed to hold used fuel indefinitely. Rather, their mission is electricity production for homes and industry. Without the zero-carbon energy that nuclear plants provide, our air quality and global-warming emissions would be worse from having to burn more fossil fuels.

Now, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners and the Nuclear Energy Institute, an association of nuclear utilities and reactor vendors, have asked a federal court to order the Department of Energy to promptly suspend payments to the waste fund until Congress addresses the waste problem in new legislation. Should Congress fail to act, or nothing is done to restart the Yucca Mountain project, "DOE cannot justify continued waste fund fee collections," NARUC and NEI said in the court petition.

Those who say this is an extreme step to take are simply wrong. They offer no reasonable alternative for breaking the political deadlock over nuclear waste. By taking the matter to court, NARUC and NEI hope policymakers will be forced to address the waste problem. Basically, they have two options: Either revive the Yucca Mountain project or follow a consent-based approach in selecting a new repository site.

The Department of Energy used such an approach in gaining public acceptance for a repository to hold plutonium-contaminated waste in southeastern New Mexico. A blue-ribbon presidential commission has urged DOE to adopt this approach in selecting an alternative to Yucca Mountain. This could yield positive results, since local governments in at least three states - New Mexico, Texas and South Carolina - have expressed interest in hosting the repository.

There is no guarantee this will happen. But inaction is no longer an option. Twelve states - including California, Massachusetts and Wisconsin - have banned the construction of new nuclear plants until the waste problem is resolved. The byproducts of electricity production and the manufacture of nuclear weapons cannot stay forever in scores of de facto repositories. The public has a right to an efficient and safe long-term waste-storage system.

James McGovern, of Ocean Township, is an energy consultant to government and industry.

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Part of what’s so insidious about the conservative assault on critical race theory is how it exploits a deep-seated rift in the Democratic coalition, one that’s been apparent since the advent of the back-to-the-city movement in the 1980s and 1990s. That divide has never been fully resolved — and it needs to be soon. Of the various factions that comprise the Democratic Party’s base, two in ...

Just this month, we’ve seen political collapse in Haiti and military collapse in Afghanistan. South Sudan, the world’s newest nation, turned 10 years old amid looming famine, rampant corruption and continued violence. Ethiopia’s civil war threatens the country’s very existence. All these disasters have two things in common: In each, the United States has poured in more than a billion dollars ...

On the night before he faced his brutal execution at the hands of the Roman Empire, Jesus of Nazareth gathered his followers together for a meal. It was at that meal, commonly known as the Last Supper, that Jesus gave himself to those followers in the simple gifts of bread and wine. His only instructions to those followers came in these words: “Do this in memory of me.” Overwhelmed by fear, ...

Every four years the Summer Olympics bring the world together. Through boycotts and terrorist attacks, the Olympics have persisted, yielding only to World War I and World War II. Athletes, some of whom have spent most of their lives preparing for this moment, come together to represent their countries and test themselves against the best of every country. Spectators from around the world also ...

COVID-19 cases are rising, vaccinations are low, and most of the host country wants to cancel the event. Yet, the Games should go on. The 2020 Tokyo Summer Olympics were delayed until July 23, 2021, due to the pandemic. The rescheduled Games face continued headwinds. More than 80 percent of Japanese, fearing a super-spreader event, want the Olympics canceled. Only 15 percent of the population ...

The best local coverage, unlimited

Sign up for a digital subscription to The Press of Atlantic City now and take advantage of a great offer.

LEARN MORE

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News