Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Staying rational best on baby delivery, by Emmet Hirsch
0 Comments

Staying rational best on baby delivery, by Emmet Hirsch

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}
Baby's delivery

A baby’s delivery is an emotional time, but given the stakes involved, objectivity needs to be guiding the process.

I had a bad week.

I am an obstetrician-gynecologist, and on most days I love my job. It is a rare privilege for anyone, even physicians, to participate in the most uplifting moments of other people’s lives. Obstetricians and midwives do so nearly every day. Childbirth is every bit as exhilarating to me after 30 years in practice as it was when I was a medical student. In obstetrics, for the most part, we deliver euphoria.

And yet there are occasions in obstetrics when elation turns to despair. Such transformations can occur in an instant. These sudden, usually unpredictable and potentially devastating events can take a heavy toll, not only on families, but also on practitioners. True emergencies are not frequent even in obstetrics, but when they occur, and even if disaster is averted through natural processes or good care, they take a lot out of us. It is natural to question why we subject ourselves to the emotional risks of these events.

It is also rational to reflect on whether our decisions contributed to or failed to avert a traumatic episode. Decision-making in medicine is all about estimating odds: What are the probabilities of each outcome for each therapeutic option? Which course is most likely to lead to more benefit and less risk? In obstetrics, clinical judgment is particularly challenging, because we are usually dealing with at least two patients — mother and fetus. The interests of these two patients, who are inextricably bound, don’t always align.

One challenge obstetricians can face is shoulder dystocia, an emergency occurring in roughly 1% of vaginal deliveries. In a shoulder dystocia, the baby’s shoulders get stuck behind the bones of the mother’s pelvis after the baby’s head has emerged. These obstructions are almost always resolved without harm. However, serious injury to the fetus can occur, including fractures of the baby’s collar or arm bones, nerve injury to its arm or interruption of oxygen flow to its brain. It is essential to skillfully resolve the problem as quickly as possible.

Though shoulder dystocia is associated with large fetuses, it is unpredictable and can occur in any pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends diminishing the risk by offering cesarean section in pregnancies with estimated fetal weights of more than 11 pounds. But obstetricians and midwives who have lived through the harrowing experience of a shoulder dystocia might be inclined to lower that cutoff.

That would be a mistake.

The organization notes that for healthy women carrying fetuses with an estimated weight of more than 9.9 pounds, 3,695 cesarean deliveries would be required to prevent one permanent neonatal injury. Performing all those cesareans would exchange one set of adverse outcomes for a catalog of other complications to the mother and baby, some potentially life-threatening.

Similar complex risk-benefit considerations apply to many other problems in obstetrics. Every time an obstetrician, midwife or labor room nurse dons scrubs, they expose themselves to a profound personal risk: that they will be associated with a devastating outcome. Our own anxieties, and the resonance most of us have with our patients, can compel obstetricians to avoid risk in a way that may not align with optimal care.

But if we are to remain true to our oaths, we should suppress our personal feelings and perform a risk-benefit calculation on behalf of our patients.

During my bad week, I had two shoulder dystocias back to back, both thankfully with good outcomes for mothers and babies. Those deliveries wounded me. And though I have recovered, there are more shoulder dystocias in my future, and other scenarios in which I might be tempted to let my own concerns influence my decision-making.

Yet if I wish to continue doing my best, I have no choice but to don my scrubs again and assume the personal risks. I will counsel my patients regarding the relative risks and benefits of each option to help them make the choices that are right for them.

For a physician, the abandonment of objectivity can do harm.

Emmet Hirsch is a clinical professor at the University of Chicago, vice chair of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at NorthShore University HealthSystem and author of “The Education of Doctor Montefiore.”

0 Comments

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

The British monarchy can be ruthless and decisive when it thinks its survival is at stake. For many years the heir to the throne, Prince Charles, advocated a slimmed down royal family — keeping official duties to a select core of the clan. But he found himself blocked by his mother, the Queen, who protected the status of his younger brother Andrew, the Duke of York. That is until the duke’s ...

I remember the magnificent moment I realized my niece could read. She was 6, and had come for the weekend. It was bedtime and we were reading “Make Way for Ducklings,” the children’s classic about the mallard couple who waddle around Boston trying to find a safe place to raise their brood. After many adventures, they end up on an island in the Boston Public Garden lagoon. “Now you try,” I urged. ...

FORT WORTH, Texas — On May 2, 2011, Lafayette Square, the park directly across from the White House, was filled with euphoric throngs of young people, celebrating something they thought might never come to pass. An elite team of U.S. Navy SEALs had just achieved the impossible: They killed Osama Bin Laden, the elusive international terrorist responsible for the murders of thousands of ...

It’s increasingly hard to see how the other half lives. The pandemic has only created more means for the haves to distance themselves from the have-nots. Physically, you can pay $12 to make sure no member of the riffraff sits next to you on the Flix bus. Temporally, you can hand $30 over to Southwest to receive priority boarding and minimize standing for too long next to the commoners. Though ...

People who think that Donald Trump’s influence on the Republican Party has been mostly malign are always looking for signs that it is fading. Matt Lewis, writing in the Daily Beast, sees several such indicators, from the empty seats at recent Trump events to the struggles of some of the candidates he has endorsed. Josh Kraushaar, a columnist for National Journal, thinks Trump has handed his ...

Ben Affleck, the movie star and avid gambler who has struggled with alcohol addiction, is one of sports gambling’s most visible pitchmen. He’s center stage in a TV ad for the mobile wagering app WynnBET. “We all want to win. Let’s win together!” Affleck exclaims. Aaron Paul, the actor who only played an addict in “Breaking Bad” and waved off hard drug use himself after seeing his girlfriend ...

The news that a juror in Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial apparently failed to disclose that he was a victim of sexual abuse might be stunning, but as a legal matter it’s likely to blow over. Courts hesitate to delve into jury deliberations, and defendants who plead juror misconduct hardly ever win. And the reasons we draw a curtain around the jury room help preserve the myth of impartiality that ...

There are two problems with the conventional wisdom about polarization in American society. The first is that it mistakes widespread conflict with one master battle between conservatives and liberals. The second is that it overlooks a large percentage of Americans who do not identify with either the Democrats or the Republicans. The result of these two mistakes is the ongoing, misleading ...

Just last month the Democrats’ “historic” legislative push, Build Back Better, hit a wall as it was entering its final stages. That wall was Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Since that moment both the left and the right have been in an uproar. Progressives felt betrayed since they had allowed the bipartisan infrastructure package to pass, which they had originally been holding as ...

The best local coverage, unlimited

Sign up for a digital subscription to The Press of Atlantic City now and take advantage of a great offer.

LEARN MORE

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News