Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Bayada settles whistleblower's False Claims Act suit for $17 million

Bayada settles whistleblower's False Claims Act suit for $17 million

{{featured_button_text}}
Carousel New Jersey courts icon.jpg

Bayada, a national home health care company based in Moorestown, Burlington County, agreed to pay $17 million to settle allegations of illegal kickbacks in exchange for patient referrals, U.S. Justice Department officials said Wednesday.

A whistleblower suit filed in New Jersey in 2017 alleged that three years earlier Bayada had acquired two home-health agencies in Arizona from an operator of retirement communities to induce referrals of Medicare beneficiaries for home health services at the seller’s retirement facilities nationwide.

Details of the alleged kickbacks — from early 2014 until October 2020 — were unavailable because the original lawsuit remained under seal Wednesday. It is sealed because of allegations against other entities, the Justice Department said.

Violations of anti-kickback law do not have to involve discrete payments. “The prohibition extends to asset purchases that are intended to induce referrals,” the Justice Department said.

Bayada, which converted from a for-profit company to a nonprofit in 2018, denied the allegations in a statement and opted to settle “to avoid the significant expense of protracted litigation and allow our focus to remain on providing high quality home health care to our patients.”

The company had $1.5 billion in revenue in 2019, according to its 990 tax return. It operates in 22 states and employs 26,000, including overseas.

Bayada’s civil settlement is not an admission of liability, Justice Department said.

“When health care providers make or induce referrals that are based on kickback arrangements rather than the best interests of patients, they risk patient harm, threaten the integrity of federal health care programs and violate federal law,” acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Rachael Honig said in a news release.

The name of the senior living company that sold the home-health agencies to Bayada was redacted in the settlement agreement.

An April 2014 report in BizTucson said Bayada acquired Watermark at Home that year. Watermark Retirement Communities, which is based in Tucson, has 59 locations, according to Watermark’s website, including those in Blue Bell, Media, Philadelphia, West Chester, and Wilmington.

Asked for comment, a Watermark spokesperson said: “We are unable to participate in your article at this time.”

The whistleblower, David Freedman, will receive $3.06 million of Bayada’s $17 million payment.

Freedman, who was Bayada’s director of strategic growth from 2009 to 2016, filed a second whistleblower lawsuit against Bayada in 2019. The U.S. government also joined that lawsuit, which centered on Bayada’s undisclosed payment to a lobbyist to help it purchase Ocean County’s home-health agency in 2014.

Freda L. Wolfson, U.S. Chief District Judge for the District of New Jersey, dismissed that case in May, determining the allegations did not fall under the federal False Claims Act, but suggested that as stated they may have violated state law.

Sign up for our Crime & Courts newsletter

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

The best local coverage, unlimited

Sign up for a digital subscription to The Press of Atlantic City now and take advantage of a great offer.

LEARN MORE

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

PLEASE BE ADVISED: Soon we will no longer integrate with Facebook for story comments. The commenting option is not going away, however, readers will need to register for a FREE site account to continue sharing their thoughts and feedback on stories. If you already have an account (i.e. current subscribers, posting in obituary guestbooks, for submitting community events), you may use that login, otherwise, you will be prompted to create a new account.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News