Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Endangered birds may be evicted from Atlantic City airport

Endangered birds may be evicted from Atlantic City airport

  • 0
Only $5 for 5 months

Edward Lea / Staff Photographer/

Edward Lea / Staff Photographer


8df19fc5-df30-5d78-91f9-8aac317f1b362993f503f931a303bd02ffd9c460dd8af7012619_nws_sjta 316.JPGpressofac.local0


8df19fc5-df30-5d78-91f9-8aac317f1b36334ec1c4f315d62f9a82781b1c77dc4a58012619_nws_sjta 316.JPGpressofac.local0

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is studying the impact its purchase of Atlantic City International Airport would have, as well as of other New Jersey airports, its chairman said in a letter to congressmen this week.

For 15 years, two state-protected bird species have called Atlantic City International Airport home: the endangered upland sandpiper and the threatened grasshopper sparrow.

There are only five pairs of the former in the state, and few spots in South Jersey where they can be reintroduced.

But soon, they may be looking for another place to live. The South Jersey Transportation Authority wants to mow the tall 290-acre grassland area that’s been maintained for them inside the airport’s boundaries and establish a new conservation site for the birds elsewhere in the Pinelands.

The agency, which owns the property in Egg Harbor Township, is requesting an amendment to an agreement it has had with the state Pinelands Commission since 2004. The deal allowed the SJTA to develop parts of the airport within the Pinelands in exchange for creating grassland habitat.

The reason for the sudden change? Safety concerns, the SJTA contends.

Birds can collide with planes in flight and during takeoff and pose a threat to aircraft and animal safety, said Sarah Brammell, a Federal Aviation Administration-qualified airport wildlife biologist speaking on behalf of the SJTA at a Pinelands Commission public hearing Tuesday.

A report prepared by environmental consultant Environmental Resource Solutions Inc. found the number of strike reports involving upland sandpiper and grasshopper sparrows increased after the grassland area was established.

No damage was reported.

“When these things happen, they can be rare, but they can be catastrophic,” Brammell told the commission, adding the tall grass attracts insects and other raptor species.

Overall though, there was a decrease in wildlife strikes at the airport from 2011 to 2017, according to the report.

Environmental groups are concerned that mowing the grass would attract larger birds, like Canada geese. Clashes between large birds and aircraft poses a greater risk to safety, they say.

Around the U.S., wildlife managers use airport fields as habitat for small, threatened or endangered birds, said Eric Stiles, president and CEO of New Jersey Audubon.

“You have much smaller birds, so the number of Canada geese goes down. ... The risk factor for human safety goes down. The conservation value goes up. It’s a win for everyone,” he said.

There also are few spots in the state where upland sandpipers and grasshopper sparrows can thrive. They live in tall grasslands and large hayfields, which mostly exist in South Jersey and around airports in less development parts of the state.

The Pinelands Commission is considering three different alternatives to the 2004 agreement, which comes at the same time political leaders look to have Port Authority looks to take over the airport.

The current draft of the amendment would require the SJTA to put $500,000 into an escrow account to cover the acquisition and preservation of 295 acres of suitable vacant land in the Pinelands, estimated to cost about $3 million. A 62-acre Grassland Conservation and Management Area would be created for the birds.

Only five pairs of upland sandpipers are known to exist in New Jersey, said Sharon Petzinger, senior zoologist with the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife. She said if the current habitat at the airport were mowed and another one created, the migratory birds would likely flock to the new location.

But Rhyan Grech, policy advocate for the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, said the proposed payment plan is not justified.

“Making cash payments the price for destroying protected species habitats is a prescription for losing critical habitat anywhere,” Grech said. “And perhaps ultimately everywhere.”

SJTA General Counsel Lauren Staiger said there are no plans at the moment to develop the grassland if it is mowed.

“As of right now, I don’t believe (the area will be developed),” Staiger said. “The revisions that are made to the (memorandum of agreement), as far as I understand, won’t have development in that area at this point in time.”

The Pinelands Commission will announce its decision in April.

Contact: 609-272-7258 Twitter @AvalonZoppo

Related to this story

The best local coverage, unlimited

Sign up for a digital subscription to The Press of Atlantic City now and take advantage of a great offer.


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

PLEASE BE ADVISED: Soon we will no longer integrate with Facebook for story comments. The commenting option is not going away, however, readers will need to register for a FREE site account to continue sharing their thoughts and feedback on stories. If you already have an account (i.e. current subscribers, posting in obituary guestbooks, for submitting community events), you may use that login, otherwise, you will be prompted to create a new account.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


Breaking News